Legal Opinion

Horvath v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Town of Carmel appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated February 27, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the appellant’s motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

On the afternoon of July 11, 1994, the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nurek v. Town of VestalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Hough v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Kovalsky v. Village of YaphankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Ledet v. BattleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Ham v. Giffords Fuel Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Misek-Falkoff v. Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Cuzzo v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API