Legal Opinion

State Farm Insurance Companies v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1981No. CA 81-96PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawson Cloninger, Judge.

The trial court directed a verdict for appellee Thomas D. Gilbert, the insured, under a homeowner’s policy written by appellant State Farm Insurance Companies, on a finding that a policy provision excluding from coverage property damage caused directly or indirectly from “earth movement” was patently ambiguous. The parties agree that the property damage was $4,900.

Appellant urges on this appeal that the trial court was in error in holding the exclusion ambiguous, and, even if the exclusion is ambiguous, the question should have been submitted to the jury.

We reverse the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Builders, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company v. HydeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Dorr v. School District No. 26Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  4. Stewart v. Preferred Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Underwood v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Pizza Hut of America, Inc. v. West General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Chris Polychron v. Crum & Forster Insurance Companies International Insurance Company, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Crum & Forster Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Washington County Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API