Legal Opinion

Arce v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. There was evidence sufficient to go to the jury upon the question as to whether the accident was caused by the failure to keep in order the wheelbarrow which plaintiff was ordered and compelled to use. (Matter of Tonawanda Iron & Steel Co., 234 Fed. 198; The Osceola, 189 U. S. 158; Malukas v. Overseas Shipping Co., Inc., 197 App. Div. 224; The Edith Godden, 23 Fed. 43; The Southwark, 191 U. S. 1; Marra v. Hamburg-Am. P. A. Gesellschaft, 180 App. Div. 75.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. The Edith GoddenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
  4. In re Tonawanda Iron & Steel Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1916
  5. Malukas v. Overseas Shipping Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API