Legal Opinion

Cargill v. Czelatdko

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 12, 2004No. 4-04-0278PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Turner

In July 2003, plaintiffs, Mark Cargill and Rebecca Renee Cargill, refiled a complaint against defendants, Thomas Czelatdko, E. David Jones, and Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center, alleging healing art malpractice. In September 2003, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which the trial court denied. In March 2004, the court granted defendants’ motion to certify the following questions for interlocutory review pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308(a) (155 Ill. 2d R. 308(a)):

“1. Did P.A. 90 — 579 resurrect the amendments to [slection 2 — 622 of the Code of Civil Procedure (inserted by EA. 89 — 7)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Land v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. HickmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. ReedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. O'Casek v. Children's Home & Aid SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roth v. Illinois Insurance Guaranty FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Beauchamp v. ZimmermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Jackson v. Victory Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Crull v. SRIRATANAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API