Legal Opinion
Ruben Escano v. Verified Docu Service, Inc. and Jarren Clores a/k/a Brandon Clores
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided June 8, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00513Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO RUBEN ESCANO, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:25-cv-00513-JB-JHR VERIFIED DOCU SERVICE, INC. and JARREN CLORES a/k/a BRANDON CLORES, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY [DOC. 82] THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Pro Se Plaintiff Ruben Escano’s Second Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendant Verified Docu Service, Inc. and for Costs (“motion to compel”) [Doc. 82]. Verified Docu Service filed a response, [Doc. 89], and Escano filed a reply [Doc. 91]. Having reviewed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Punt v. Kelly ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Gomez v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Regan-Touhy v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Edeh v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.