Legal Opinion

The People v. Clardy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1929No. 18367. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

Frank Clardy, plaintiff in error, pleaded guilty in the municipal court of Chicago to an information charging that on March 1, 1927, in the city of Chicago, he did then and there unlawfully carry concealed on or about his person a revolver, in violation of section 4 of an act entitled, “An act revising the law relating to deadly weapons.” (Laws of 1925, p. 339.) He was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment in the house of correction and to pay a fine of $100 and costs of suit. He prosecutes this writ of error for review of the record by this court.

The assignments of error are, first, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. The People v. SaltisIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People ex rel. Joyce v. StrassheimIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. StoyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. People v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GerschIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. The People v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. The PEOPLE v. WalcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. ManuelIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. The People v. BorgesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API