Legal Opinion

Bass v. Southern Surety Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The only question involved upon this appeal is the validity- of a decree in favor of Bass against the defendant, J. W. Solomon, entered by the Chancellor and affirmed by the Court of Appeals, which is based upon the following magistrate’s judgment, to-wit :•

“Date of trial, Aug. 26-, 1922.
“Parties to suit: F. H. Bass v. J. W. Solomon & Solomon Construction & Engineering Co.

Attorney for Lynch, Crownover.

“Amount of Judgment. Judgment for plaintiff, $499.95 for which execution may issue and cost of suit. A. IT. Simmons, J. P.
“Returning officer, F. M. Jackson.
“Witnesses: Costs: Officer’s Return.”

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. David Hadden & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Elliott & Co. v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hurt v. ChildressTennessee Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Kilcrease's heirs v. BlytheTennessee Supreme Court · 1845
  5. R. S. Hollins & Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
  2. Barrow v. BarrowTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Whittaker v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  4. Brandis Bradley, Individually v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ex Rel, Daniel Cameron, Attorney GeneralKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Fleming v. KempCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API