Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Crafts

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1815PublishedCited by 38 opinions

IN ERROR from the court of common pleas of Otsego county. Crafts brought an action of assumpsit against Pierce, in the court -below.- The declaration was on the counts, for money ienb money paid, and for money had and received to the use of the plaintiff The defendant pleaded wow assumpsit. • 4 •/ At the trial, in support of his declaration, the plaintiff offered in evidence two notes.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR from the court of common pleas of Otsego county. Crafts brought an action of assumpsit against Pierce, in the court -below.- The declaration was on the counts, for money ienb money paid, and for money had and received to the use of the plaintiff The defendant pleaded wow assumpsit. • 4 •/ At the trial, in support of his declaration, the plaintiff offered in evidence two notes. The first -was as follows: “ For value received, due William Douglas's, or bearer, fourteen dollars and fifty cents, with interest, payable the 1st March next. Springfield, 8th November, 1811. James Pierce.”…

1Opinion of the CourtPlatt, J.

This was an action of indebitatus assumpsit for money had and received, money lent, &c.; and the chief question is, whethey the promissory notes in the hands of the plaintiff below, as bearer, were properly admitted in evidence under sucha count?

It is clear, that as well before as .since the statute making notes negotiable, the person named as payee might give such note in evidence, under the general counts for money lent, or money had and received, Sec. (Clerke v. Martin, 2 Lord Raym. 755. Story v. Atkins, 2 Stra. 719. Grant v. Vaughan, 3 Burr. 1516. Smith v. Smith, 2 Johns. Rep. 235. Arnold…

2Cited by38 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of the United States v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  2. Hushes v. WheelerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
  3. Murray v. JudahNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  4. Ward v. Van BokkelenNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  5. Ela v. American Merchants' Union Express Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API