Legal Opinion

State v. Armengau

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 2017No. 16AP-355PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Armengau,

2017-Ohio-197.] THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 16AP-355 v. : (C.P.C. No. 13CR-2217) Javier H. Armengau, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on January 19, 2017 On brief: Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Jocelyn S. Kelly Lowe, and Katherine E. Mullin, for appellee. On brief: Javier H. Armengau, Pro Se. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas SADLER, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Javier H. Armengau, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. WaldenOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LundyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. GavenOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. CowanOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. BrodbeckOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. ArmengauOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API