Legal Opinion

U-Haul Co. of East Bay v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1992No. 89-CV-1383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

At a bench trial in Small Claims Court, the judge found defendant-appellant, U-Haul Company of East Bay, Inc., liable for $450.13 in damages caused by a U-Haul truck to an automobile owned by Robert Watkins and insured by plaintiff-appellee. Appellant contends that it should not be held liable as an “owner” of the vehicle under the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, D.C.Code § 40-408 (1990 Repl.). We affirm.

Before trial, the parties stipulated to most of the facts. Herbert Gaines rented a U-Haul truck, which struck the legally parked car of Robert Watkins on July…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. KeyesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Curtis v. CuffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. McClellan v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Lee v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  5. Spindle v. ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Agomo v. FentyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Stover v. CritchfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Dorsey v. YantambweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Perkins v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  5. Shannon-Huber v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API