Blakeslee v. Rossman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Clark County. Replevin. Defendant justified as sheriff under an attachment against the goods of one Earnham, at the suit of one Allen, a creditor of Earnham; alleging that the mortgage from Earnham under which plaintiffs claimed the goods, was fraudulent and void as to creditors.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Clark County. Replevin. Defendant justified as sheriff under an attachment against the goods of one Earnham, at the suit of one Allen, a creditor of Earnham; alleging that the mortgage from Earnham under which plaintiffs claimed the goods, was fraudulent and void as to creditors. Upon a verdict for the defendant, a new trial being denied, judgment was rendered in defendant’s favor for ten cents damages, and $44.29 costs, and for a return of the- property to him. Erom this judgment, plaintiffs appealed. The errors alleged here will sufficiently appear from the…
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
I. Several of the questions raised upon this record were decided adversely to the plaintiffs in Blakeslee v. Rossman, 43 Wis., 116, and are therefore abandoned by their counsel on this appeal. But the same counsel object that the verdict in this case is incomplete, and fata^y defective, and for that reason the judgment should be reversed. The jury found for the defendant on all the issues, and assessed his damages at the sum of ten cents; and further found that the defendant is, and was at the commencement of the action, the owner and entitled to the possession of the property, goods and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blakeslee v. RossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stein v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Fletcher Bros. v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Muska v. Economy Block Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960