Legal Opinion
London v. Guzman
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12 CV 8509PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CHARLES R. NORGLE, District Judge
Plaintiff Kerry London (“London”) sues Defendants Chicago Police Officers David Guzman (“Officer Guzman”), Lawrence Stec (“Officer Stec”) and W. Murphy (“Officer Murphy”), and the City of Chicago (collectively, “Defendants”) for false arrest under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and for state-law malicious prosecution. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts1
On November 15, 2011, Officer Guzman prepared a Complaint for Search…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lisa Williamson v. Mark Curran, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Sow v. Fortville Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Albert Woods v. City of Chicago, Officer Makowski, Chicago Police Officer 16971, Officer Alanis, Chicago Police Officer 5001Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brock v. City Of Chicago Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Gomez v. RihaniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Pogodzinski v. Village of Skokie ILDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Price v. Federal Bureau Of PrisonsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Snyder v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.