Legal Opinion

Burghart v. Sausele

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 12, 1926No. 25,546PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying a new trial after a directed verdict for plaintiff.

The action is on a promissory note executed by defendant to the Farmers State Bank of Olivia, and alleged in the complaint to have been sold and assigned to plaintiff for value “prior to the commencement of this action.”

The answer alleged that plaintiff and C. A. Kuske, president of the bank, were agents for the sale of lands in northern Michigan owned by one Jordan; that they proposed an exchange of a quarter section of the Michigan land for a quarter section of land owned by defendant in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mosness v. German-American Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. First National Bank v. BuschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. First National Bank v. MalmquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Goldman v. WeismanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Abramovitz v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Minnesota Baptist Convention of MinneapolisWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Texas Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API