Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Porpoise Point Partnership v. St. Johns County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 22, 1988No. 88-767Published

1ConcurrenceSharp, Chief Judge

While I agree with the majority opinion, I would grant the certiorari petition on a narrower basis — failüre to conform with this court’s mandate in the prior proceeding, 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 405 (1978); or the “law of the case,” 3 Fla. Jur.2d Appellate Review § 414 (1978).

In Porpoise Point Partnership v. St. Johns County, 470 So.2d 850 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), we said:

The petition for certiorari review is granted, the order of the circuit court is quashed and the cause is remanded for entry of an order remanding to the county zoning authority for a determination of the appropriate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. PORPOISE POINT v. St. Johns CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Porpoise Point Partnership v. St. Johns CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API