Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clowes v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1994No. 411 C.D. 1992Published

1DissentColins, Judge

I must dissent from the scholarly opinion of the majority in this extremely troubling and difficult matter.

As noted by the majority, Dr. Berschling, whom the referee found credible, testified that the “claimant suffered no mental disability or injury prior to his transfer and change of duties” and, further, in Finding of Fact No. 10(i), “it was the progressive accumulation of traumatic experiences while in the night felony homicide division which caused claimant’s mental disability.” The referee then continued to state his legal opinion that there was insufficient evidence to prove claimant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Berardelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Leo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Supinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Hershey Chocolate Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API