Legal Opinion
In Re Adamic
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 26, 2003No. 19-10811PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ENTER
SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court after a hearing on February 19, 2003, concerning the Debtor’s Motion for Entry of Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Enter Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(h).
The Debtor, Bruce Adamic, requests that the Court enter an order to show cause, directed to the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Employment and Training (“Department”), requiring it to demonstrate why sanctions should not be imposed for its…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lee v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rushton v. Bank of Utah (In re C.W. Mining Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- In re SoriUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency v. Kozlowski (In re Kozlowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Wentz v. Saxon Mortgage (In Re Wentz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Kozlowski v. Michigan Unemployment Insurance AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.