Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Monteiro

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 31, 2008No. 06-P-1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrainger, J.

The precise point at which an encounter between the police and the public “constitutes an intrusion of constitutional dimensions requiring justification,” Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782, 789 (1996), continues to challenge courts, law enforcement officials, and defense counsel as the factual circumstances underlying cases raised on appeal remain as varied as human conduct itself. Here, the Commonwealth appeals the allowance of the defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, a firearm, discarded by the running defendant under conditions which we recount in full.

Factual background.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. StouteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. SanchezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. SykesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. SweezeyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CabreraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  2. Howe v. TarvezianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. RamirezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. WarrenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API