Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 28, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

We review on writ of error judgment of conviction of larceny of a hog.

The evidence of identity of the hog, the head of which was found in the possession of the accused, is uncertain and unsatisfactory and, we think, legally insufficient to support a verdict of guilty.

Especially is this true when we find in the record convincing and uncontradicted evidence produced from several disinterested and unimpeached witnesses that the head found in the possession of the accused was the head of an entirely different hog which accused had purchased from the true owner thereof in the regular course of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Carson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Pella v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API