Legal Opinion
Drury v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 30, 2002No. 00-356 LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
The court has before it plaintiffs Motion to Retransfer (Pl.’s Mot.), defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Transfer (Def.’s Resp.) and plaintiffs Rebuttal Memorandum in Support of Motion to Retransfer (Pl.’s Rebuttal). Plaintiff seeks to retransfer his case back to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
A. Background
Plaintiff first commenced this action on April 15,1993 seeking damages for negligent and/or intentional trespass. Pl.’s Mot. at 5; Def.’s Mot. at 3. On March 17, 2000, defendant moved to transfer the case to this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Angel Rodriguez v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- BMR Gold Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ridge Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Vandesande v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.