Legal Opinion

Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 28, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment rendered against Jahn was

subject to the motion for new trial duly made but not disposed of for more than five years. The assignee of the judgment was not obliged to take a writ of garnishment against a creditor of the judgment debtor until the motion for new trial was disposed of. The right of the assignee of the judgment to a writ of garnishment against the creditor of the judgment debtor existed during the period the judgment was effective and the garnishee could not collaterally attack the judgment not shown to be void.

Rehearing denied.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J.…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Fire and Casualty Company v. ColluraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Ramos v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Burshan v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Crosby v. BurlesonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Ephrem v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API