Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doerr v. National Fire Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1923Published

1DissentCox, P. J.

(dissenting). — I cannot agree with the majority opinion that the evidence in this case is sufficient to take the question of waiver by defendant of the locking device of the policy to the jury. That clause is as follows: “In consideration of the reduction in premium granted under this policy, it is made a condition thereof that the insured will at all times during the life of this policy maintain on the automobile insured under this policy, in working order, a locking device known as approved lock approved by the Underwriter’s Laboratories of the National Board of Eire Underwriters and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Colonius v. Hibernia Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Card v. Phœnix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Gerhart Realty Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Boren v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API