Earle v. Aycock
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This action arose out of a grievance proceeding filed by the respondent, James E. Earle, with the State Employee Grievance Committee as a result of respondent’s dismissal from his position of Environmentalist I at the Appalachia II (Greenville-Pickens) office of the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC). The State Employee Grievance Committee found that respondent should be reinstated to his position of Environmentalist I but held in paragraph S of its findings that:
There may well be difficulties in having Mr. Earle (respondent) continue working in the same assignment.…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Earle v. AycockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981