State v. Worthy
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentLobrano, J.
|,I respectfully dissent. Because the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, I would affirm the conviction. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 326, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2793, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Additionally, I would remand the case in order to impose the appropriate service charge required along with restitution.
I find the wording in the majority opinion as it relates the application of the Jackson standard of review problematic. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- State v. RicksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.