Legal Opinion

Aronin v. Sattinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 1956No. Civ. No. 21807Published

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

The respondent herein made a motion to dismiss the appeals of Barney Sattinger and Harry Bergman upon the ground that no reporter’s transcript on appeal has been filed by either of them as required by rule 4 of the Rules on Appeal.

The clerk’s transcript, among other things, shows that an action in damages for fraud was commenced October 27, 1954; that the relief prayed for was a judgment against the defendants for the sum of $4,000, by way of special and general damages, and the further sum of $2,500 for exemplary damages and for costs of suit. On December 20, 1955, the motion of M. J.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pastore v. FloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API