Legal Opinion

Meritas Mills v. Way

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1919No. 9880Published

Action for damages; from city court of Columbus—Judge Tigner. June 4, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. The plaintiff’s amendment to the tenth paragraph of her petition, made at the trial court, was not such as materially to change the cause of action, and thus open the whole petition to demurrer at that time; nor did the court err in overruling the demurrer to that paragraph as amended.

2. “Except in ease of railroad companies, the master is not liable to one servant for injuries arising from the negligence or misconduct of other servants about the same business” (Civil Code of 1910, § 3120), nor is the master liable for injuries to a servant resulting from the negligence of the servant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DeasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Butler v. Atlanta Buggy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Wing v. Savannah Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API