Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Rexburg v. Madison County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1988No. Nos. 16763, 16764Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

The assessment of Justice Bakes that the misapportionment was caused by an inadvertent decimal point error finds me in complete agreement. However, that is the full extent to which it is possible to be in agreement with what he has written. The realities of the situation are in need of closer examination.

First, to properly apportion the tax receipts which are taken in by the tax collector is a duty or obligation not on the county of Madison, or of any of the 44 counties. That duty falls on the county auditor who is “to draw on county treasury funds to the clerk of every city, school district,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. EllisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Knabb v. FraterWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lincoln Cty. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Westamerica Securities, Inc. v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Moritz v. HorsmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API