Legal Opinion

Dendy v. Waite

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 3, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Witherspoon, J., Abbeville, June, 1891. Action by Lula Dendy against W. F. Waite, F. A. Connor, and Mitchell Goggins. The main facts of the case are stated in the opinion of this court. The deed made by Connor to himself contained in its preamble the following address and recital: “To all to whom these presents shall come. I, F. A. Connor, mortgagee, send greeting.

Read the full summary

Before Witherspoon, J., Abbeville, June, 1891. Action by Lula Dendy against W. F. Waite, F. A. Connor, and Mitchell Goggins. The main facts of the case are stated in the opinion of this court. The deed made by Connor to himself contained in its preamble the following address and recital: “To all to whom these presents shall come. I, F. A. Connor, mortgagee, send greeting. Whereas, by virtue of a power of sale conferred upon me under a mortgage given by E. G. Dendy, dated January 3rd, 1881, I, the said F. A. Connor, mortgagee, after having duly advertised the premises hereinafter mentioned and…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Pope.

In January, 1884, one E. G. Dendy, as the owner of a tract of land, containing sixty-eight acres, situated in Abbeville County, in this State, mortgaged the same to Francis A. Connor to secure a debt of $213, and of this debt Dendy paid the one-half thereof. In September, 1884, E. G. Dendy sold this land to one W. F. Waite at the price of $475, secured to be paid by three notes, each for $158.33$-, and secured by a mortgage of the premises. Only a part of one of said notes was paid. Both the foregoing mortgages were duly recorded. On…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  2. Scott v. Independent Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API