Barnett v. Madigan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) HARRY BARNETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 19 C 1368 ) v. ) Judge Virginia M. Kendall ) MADIGAN et al, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Nearly a decade ago, Plaintiff Harry Barnett took it upon himself to begin protesting what he considered illegal business practices at Budd Engineering. He did so in the form of an “exposé” website and picketing outside of Budd Engineering’s registered place of business—which just so happened to be the residence of Rita and Burton Siegal, the corporation’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hecker v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.