Legal Opinion

Fairmont Creamery Co. v. Darger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court. — F. M. Powers, Judge. The.facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. The defendants appeal.-

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The plaintiff is a corporation of Nebraska, with its principal place of business in the city of Omaha, and *733engaged generally in the creamery business in Iowa, as well as elsewhere. It was indicted December 7, 1912, for unfair discrimination, in that, as was alleged, it had paid more for cream or butter fat in one locality than in another, in the absence of differences in grade or quality or cost of transportation- — -not to meet competition, but to crush a competitor. On trial, the court, on motion of the State, directed an acquittal, and in this action damages are claimed, for that, as is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Quinn v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Scott v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Seippel v. BlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Eggert v. Interstate Investment & Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Morrison v. Carroll ClinicSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Greeson v. GreesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Frazier v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Bliss v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API