Legal Opinion

City of Peekskill v. Schurr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that title to a certain parcel of real property automatically reverted to the plaintiff by reason of the defendant’s failure to comply with a provision in the deed, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered March 10, 2004, as denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, City of Peekskill (hereinafter the City), conveyed a parcel of real property to the defendant. According to the deed, the defendant was required to bring the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. British American Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Board of Managers of Dickerson Pond Condominium I v. JagwaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Shukovsky v. ClavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, N.Y. v. Christ the King Regional High SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. NYCTL 1998-1 v. MayfieldNew York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API