Arrington v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
After a bench trial, appellant was convicted of multiple counts of burglary and larceny. On appeal he contends the motions judge committed reversible error in denying his motion to suppress certain tangible evidence. We agree and reverse.
Insofar as relevant to the suppression issue, the evidence was as follows. On the afternoon of February 12, 1976, in the 1200 block of Q Street, N.W., Officer Jones of the Metropolitan Police Department observed appellant in a 1970 Cadillac stopped abreast of a parked car. After directing appellant to move his vehicle around the corner…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Price v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Proctor, DouglasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Schwasta v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sinclair v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.