Poole v. State

Pope, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of armed robbery and appeals. Held:

1. We have examined defendant’s first enumeration of error concerning the admission of testimony that he was seen in the possession of a knife approximately two hours after the commission of the crime for which he was charged and find it to be without merit.

2. Defendant also argues that the trial court erred in allowing the investigating officer to testify to certain statements made by two juveniles the officer interviewed in investigating the crime. Specifically, defendant argues that under the holdings in Teague v.…