Legal Opinion
Chauvin v. SOUTHERN TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 2003No. 2002 CA 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
858 So.2d 519 (2003)
Carl J. CHAUVIN
v.
SOUTHERN TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES, INC.
No. 2002 CA 1871.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
June 27, 2003.
Carl J. Chauvin, Houma, Pro SePlaintiff/Appellant.
Candy Fodor Be, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Defendant/Appellee Southern Technology & Services, Inc.
Before: FITZSIMMONS, GUIDRY, and PETTIGREW, JJ.
FITZSIMMONS, J.
Carl J. Chauvin (Chauvin) asserts a pro se appeal from an adverse judgment of the Office of Workers' Compensation. Following our review of the record and the applicable law, this court reverses and remands.
BACKGROUND
Chauvin, who was employed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- OUR LADY LAKE REG. MED. CENTER v. HelmsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moran v. G & G CONST.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Lirette v. Patterson Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- LANE MEMORIAL HOSP v. GayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Dominic v. BRECLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005