Legal Opinion
Albion Pacific Property Resources, LLC v. Seligman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 1, 2004No. C-03-3427 VRWPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks attorney fees after prevailing on a motion to remand this action to state court under a federal fee-shifting statute. Because 28 USC § 1447(c) provides for recovery of such fees, the court must decide whether and what to award. The latter calls upon the court to figure the amount of a “reasonable attorney fee.”
Defendants removed this case to federal court July 23, 2003. Doc # 1. On November 25, 2003, the court remanded the case and granted plaintiffs motion for costs and fees, with the amount of the cost and fee award to be determined after further…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cruz Ex Rel. Cruz v. Alhambra School Dist.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- In Re HPL TECHNOLOGIES, INC SECURITIES LITIGATIONDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Fleming v. Kemper National Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSI, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Access v. FedericoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.