Legal Opinion

State v. Bank of California, N.A.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1936No. 26241. Department TwoPublished

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the complaint in this case there are three causes of action, separately stated. In the first, the plaintiff seeks to recover industrial insurance premiums which it claims to be due and unpaid. In the second, recovery is sought for a penalty claimed due to the failure to pay the premiums as they became due; and in the third, a lien is sought to be established as securing the demands in the first and second causes of action. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from' which it was concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, except a small…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Bateman v. Carterville & Big Muddy Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API