Legal Opinion

Walthall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1927No. 11325Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON appellant’s application for permission to file second MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In order to save the court time and labor necessarily entailed in the consideration of the increasing number of requests for leave to file second motions for rehearing it was announced in Hickman v. State, 93 Tex. Crim. Rep. 407, 247 S. W. 518, under what circumstances only such requests would be granted or such motions considered. The principle there announced has been followed in Brazzell v. State, 103 Tex. Crim. Rep. 33, 266 S. W. 1119; Calley v. State, 103 Tex. Crim. Rep. 53, 279 S. W. 848; Duncan…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Calley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Brazzell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API