Legal Opinion

The George

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 1, 1816PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the circuit court for the district of Massachusetts. These were British vessels captured and brought in by the private armed vessels the Fly and the Washington, and libelled as prize of war. In each of them the United States-interposed'a claim,-charging that the capture was collusive, and that- the whole property ought, on that account, to be forfeited to the United States. In each case the captors applied for permission tQ make farther proof.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the circuit court for the district of Massachusetts. These were British vessels captured and brought in by the private armed vessels the Fly and the Washington, and libelled as prize of war. In each of them the United States-interposed'a claim,-charging that the capture was collusive, and that- the whole property ought, on that account, to be forfeited to the United States. In each case the captors applied for permission tQ make farther proof. In that of the George, it was allowed in the,district court, and partially received; but the. application to make still further proof, and…

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court as follows:

The.first question to be discussed is, the propriety of allowing farther proof; It is certainly á general rule in prize causes that the decision should be prompt; and. should be made, unless some good reason for departing from it exist, on the papers and testimony afforded by- the captured vessel, or which can be invoked from the papers of other .vessels in possession of the court. This rule ought to be held sacred in that whole description of causes to which the reasons on which it is founded are, applicable. The…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stolarick v. StolarickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Boston Excelsior Co. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  3. The ExperimentSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  4. Apple Inc v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. Carl Dwayne Mitchell v. People of the State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API