Legal Opinion

Ross v. Cincinnati Transit Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1956No. 8099 and 8100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, P. J.

These two appeals upon questions of law were heard together. They involve identical questions, arising upon demurrers to the amended petitions filed in each case, which were sustained by the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.

In each case the plaintiff filed a petition charging that the damages claimed were due to the joint negligence of the Cincinnati Transit Company and Taxicabs of Cincinnati, Inc. The plaintiffs settled with the taxicab company, after- its answer, reserving the right to continue their actions against the transit company.

Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed amended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. H. E. Culbertson Co. v. WardenOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State Ex Rel. Mettler v. StrattonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bingham v. Nypano Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. WelshOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Hile v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ross v. Cincinnati Transit Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Rhynard v. GoubeauxOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Miller v. RismanOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API