Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 14, 1976No. ACM 22023PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

Tried by general court-martial, military judge alone, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, of rape, in violation of Article 120, 10 U.S.C. § 920, Uniform Code of Military Justice. The approved sentence extends to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for four years and reduction to airman basic.

Appellate defense counsel invite our attention to the errors assigned by the defense counsel in his response to the review of the staff judge advocate, and, in addition, assign seven other errors. We have considered these assignments as well as those errors asserted by…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noyd v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Reed v. OhmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. LedbetterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975
  4. United States v. FitzgeraldU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MyhrbergU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  2. United States v. StormsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API