Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wells v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2013No. 49S05-1202-CR-68Published

1DissentRucker, Justice

Defendant seeks interlocutory review of the trial court’s order denying his motion for severance of offenses pursuant to Indiana Code section 35-34-1-11. Passing on the opportunity to provide guidance and clarity on an area of the law in need of both, the majority declines to address the defendant’s arguments. I would grant transfer and do so. Therefore I dissent from today’s order denying the defendant’s Petition to Transfer.

The essential facts are these. In August 2009 Quanardel Wells was charged in an eleven-count information with various offenses arising out of his alleged sexual assault…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis WernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hardin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. BarbourAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API