Legal Opinion

Ott v. Kaiser

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2001No. 01-6100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determina*830tion of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The ease is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Kevin Andrew Ott, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In order to receive a certifícate of appealability, Mr. Ott must make “a substantial showing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ott v. Kaiser, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API