Ott v. Kaiser
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determina*830tion of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The ease is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Kevin Andrew Ott, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In order to receive a certifícate of appealability, Mr. Ott must make “a substantial showing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ott v. Kaiser, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2002