Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 21, 1980No. 78-455PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash

After trial by jury defendant, Orlando Martinez, was convicted of rape and sentenced to a term of eight years imprisonment. He appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in three respects:

First, that certain testimony of the arresting officer constituted an impermissible comment on defendant’s exercise of his right to remain silent. Second, that it was error to admit testimony of psychiatrists called by both the State and defendant relating to his prior criminal conduct. Third, that the trial court erred in the forms of verdict submitted to the jury on the issue of insanity.

We affirm.

The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. McDonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. LindgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. People v. WilhoiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API