Legal Opinion

City of Acworth v. McLain

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1959No. 37562PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The defendant city insists that its general demurrers should have been sustained since the petition shows on its face that the suit is barred by the statute of limitations. This issue is properly raised by the general demurrer which expressly sets out a reliance on the statute. Smith v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 146 Ga. 69 (90 S. E. 474). The petition, however, does not seek damages resulting from the creation of a nuisance treated as permanent, as in City of LaFayette v. Hegwood, 52 Ga. App. 168 (182 S. E. 860), cited by defendant, but rather seeks damages for an abatable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Shingler v. ShinglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Gabbett v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Smith v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. KnappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Mayor & Council of Waynesboro v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API