Legal Opinion
Bickerstaff v. Gregston
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 1979No. 52123PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROMANG, Presiding Judge:
This appeal challenges the District Court’s issuance of an injunction against the Defendants-Appellants. In Appellants’ Petition in Error “the precise point[s] of law to be urged as error,” Rules — Civil Appellate Procedure 1.16(f), was stated to be “that the verdict [of which there was none], report or decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence or is contrary to law.” 12 O.S.1971, § 990. Where the assignment of error is so general as to fail to state “the precise points of law . . . ” it fails as a Petition in Error and does not present any matter for review.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Home Builders Ass'n of RealtorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Strahm v. Board of Trustees of the Benevolent & Protective OrderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Longest v. LangfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Boughan v. HeringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- National Surety Co. v. First Bank of TexolaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- PARSIA v. JOHN E. BARBRE TRUSTCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.