Legal Opinion
Grant v. Grant Textiles
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 7, 2004No. 3861PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStilwell, J.
Grant Textiles and its insurer, U.S. Fire Insurance Company, appeal the circuit court’s order reversing the decision of the full commission and finding Charles Grant’s injuries compensable under the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act. We reverse and reinstate the full commission’s decision.
FACTS
Grant is the Vice-President of Grant Textiles, where he is responsible for selling textile machinery parts. On the day of the accident, Grant drove to the Clinton House and Meeting Plantation, a private hunting preserve and meeting center owned individually by him, to deliver bobbin samples to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Douglas v. Spartan Mills, Startex DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Broughton v. South of the BorderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Howell v. Pacific Columbia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Carter v. Penney Tire and Recapping Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Grice v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Grant v. Grant TextilesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Bass v. Kenco GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.