Legal Opinion

Bunge v. First Nat. Bank

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1940No. 4189Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERT W. JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is an action in assumpsit for money had and received. The case was tried by the court without a jury. The jurisdiction of the court, the parties to the suit, and the amount in controversy are not questioned.

From depositions and the evidence taken, the court finds the following

I. Facts

1. Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the city and state of New York.

2. Defendant is a national bank organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the United States of America, and is engaged in the banking business in the borough of Mount Holly Springs,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Fifth N. Bank v. AshworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Bradley Lumber Co. v. Bradley County BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  4. Lipshitz v. Lindsay Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Stewart v. Pen Argyl National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API