Jeffrey Young v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Presiding Judge
Introduction
Jeffrey Young (“Young”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief. Young avers that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing because he alleged facts not refuted by the record demonstrating that he received constitutionally deficient assistance of counsel. In particular, Young alleges that counsel was ineffective in: (1) using his family members to. convey legal advice and information; (2) failing to take adequate measures to address his difficulties with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Darion Polk v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- Timothy Waldorf v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023