Legal Opinion

Croxen v. US Chemical Corp. of Wisconsin

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided April 2, 1982No. C 79-4003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’BRIEN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to motions on behalf of PLM Rail Car Services and Margaret Croxen. PLM Rail Car Services (formerly Sioux City Tank Car Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “PLM”) moves for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint by defendant North American Car Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “NAC”). PLM also moves to dismiss the cross-claim of third-party defendant Merichem. The plaintiff requests leave to file an amended complaint and also moves for summary judgment against defendant NAC.

The Court held a hearing in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Vette Company and Kansas City Boneless Beef, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Roger Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Iowa Power and Light Co. v. Abild Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Powder River Oil Co. v. Powder River Petroleum Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Port Auth. of New York v. Honeywell Prot. Serv.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  4. A & B Construction, Inc. v. Atlas Roofing & Skylight Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
  5. Bergerson v. Office of Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API