Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Morgan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 8, 2011No. 38337-3-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1 — Clinton Morgan appeals a 2008 jury determination that he is a sexually violent predator (SVP), under ch. 71.09 RCW, and his resulting civil commitment. Morgan asserts that a 2006 chambers meeting, which he did not attend, discussing the possibility of forcibly medicating him during the commitment proceedings, violated (1) his right to personally attend all proceedings to assist his counsel and (2) his Washington constitutional right to open proceedings. In addition, he argues that the trial court violated his due process rights when it (1) held his SVP civil commitment jury trial despite…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re the Detention of MorganWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In re the Detention of LeckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. In Re Commitment of WeeklyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. In Re Detention of MorganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API