Canada v. Coleman

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing as to certain appellees and dismissing as to others.

J. Q. Canada, and his son, Earl, the appellant herein, as partners, bought a. general store at Mud Lick, Kentucky. Thereafter, J. Q. Canada, individually, bought from the appellees, Coleman and Preece, another general store near Toler, Kentucky. Part of the consideration was paid in cash and for the balance, amounting to $1,500.00, J. Q. Canada gave Coleman and Preece his notes secured by mortgage on the stock of goods bought. After these transactions, the Mud Lick store burned, and shortly…